When he used to go hunting, Miha Mlakar would dream of killing a bear. But today, he makes his living watching the animals, peacefully, in their natural forest environment.
The turnaround to shooting bears with a camera, not a rifle, puts Mr. Mlakar, who runs bear observation tours, in step with wider efforts in the small Alpine nation to promote the coexistence of humans and bears.
Once on the verge of extinction, Slovenia’s brown bear population is booming, with the number roaming the sprawling forests having doubled in the last decade to around 1,000. As a result, encounters with bears have increased — not that it seems to unduly worry everyone.
Mr. Mlakar has built 20 hides in a remote patch of forest reachable only by off-road vehicle and takes visitors, including foreign tourists, to observe the bears. “I cannot imagine this forest without bears. Bears make the forest wild and pristine, natural, like it was a few hundred or thousand years ago… I feel a connection with bears,” he said.
Slovenian bears are even sought after abroad.
Between 1996 and 2006, eight Slovenian bears were released in the French Pyrenees, and France currently has a population of about 40 bears, whose presence divides opinion in regions where they live.
In Slovenia, more than 60% of respondents in a 2016 survey carried out in areas where bears live said they were in favour of the bears’ presence, even if many also said they would like to see the numbers regulated. “We have an average of one to three cases of physical contact between bears and humans per year,” said Rok Cerne, of the Slovenia Forest Service in charge of wildlife. “Fortunately, we haven’t registered any serious incident over the last years,” he added, stressing they were “very active in preventive measures”.
Removing food sources that could attract bears has been one such step. In villages close to bear habitats, local authorities have replaced regular plastic waste and compost bins, which can be easily opened or flipped by the animals, with containers protected by heavy metal cages.
Managing their presence
Meanwhile, damage to cattle from bear forays has remained stable, at up to €200,000 ($231,500) a year, despite the bear population increasing, Mr. Cerne said. Farmers are entitled to an 80% subsidy for using electric fences to protect flocks and the loss of cattle due to bears is compensated.
If a bear becomes a habitual visitor to a village, special intervention groups step in to kill or relocate the animal with the help of local hunters. Regular culling also keeps the population under control to ensure long-term cohabitation, Mr. Cerne said. This year, authorities have proposed culling 200 bears, twice as many as last year.
Slovenia’s approach could inspire neighbouring Romania, home to about 6,000 bears or 60% of Europe’s estimated bear population, where tourists to villages in the Carpathian Mountains often post pictures online of bears waiting to be hand-fed.
Beyond tourists’ anecdotes however, Romania has seen a “growing number of attacks” by bears, highlighted in a conservation plan published last month that recommends hunting to keep numbers at optimum levels.
Since the beginning of last year, 31 people, mostly shepherds, have been attacked, one of them fatally.
The government has proposed 4,000 bears as the ideal number in the country of 20 million people.
Learning simple rules, such as how to avoid startling bears and not feeding them, as well as efficient management like accurate counting to ascertain trends, is crucial for reducing conflicts with humans, said Mareike Brix, of German-based EuroNatur foundation.
“There is a risk, and there can be problems… But it’s also great (to have bears). Wild nature has become so rare in Europe,” she said.
Source: Read Full Article